MS932 tyre reviews

We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.

To the shop categories: All season tyres

MS932 tyre review

Grip in dry conditions

Braking in dry conditions

Grip in wet conditions

Braking in wet conditions

Grip in snow

Driving comfort

Internal noise level

Tyre wear

Fuel consumption

Average based on 40 test results
Ø 586,280 km driven

Score

Buy and information MS932

18.12.2013 from Raphael	Note 2.07
(11,265 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
225 / 45 R18 Q
HYUNDAI
Result: Would you buy again? Probably not
Comment:
It honestly is a great tire for the price but I wouldn't think Id purchase them again because I rather spend a little more and have better quality tires for my car

15.11.2013 from	Note 5
(14,484 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
/ 0
Honda pilot
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely

31.10.2013 from	Note 3.88
(14,484 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
235 / 60 R18
FORD
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely

01.11.2012 from	Note 0
(161 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
225 / 45 R17 V
LEXUS IS250
Result: Would you buy again? No way
Comment:
The tire went flat within the first week. I replaced it with another brand, despite having AWD. Honestly, the quality is low.

‹

›