HTR200 tyre reviews

We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.

To the shop categories: Car summer tyres

HTR200 tyre review

Grip in dry conditions

Braking in dry conditions

Grip in wet conditions

Braking in wet conditions

Grip in snow

Driving comfort

Internal noise level

Tyre wear

Fuel consumption

Average based on 8 test results
Ø 253,512 km driven

Score

Buy and information HTR200

27.02.2010 from	Note 3.96
(1,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
215 / 50 R13 H
Chevy Vega GT
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Last performance 13" tires I could find. Glad you still make them.

18.02.2010 from Matthew Johnston	Note 4.26
(15,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
195 / 60 R13 H
BMW 2002
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
The tires have been awesome on my 1972 BMW 2002 model. The road noise has be reduced tremendously when compared to my last tires. I would definitely buy from you again

03.08.2009 from Mike	Note 3.83
(3,200 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
175 / 50 R13 H
Austin Mini
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely

25.03.2009 from	Note 2.93
(40,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
175 / 70 R13 H
Alfa Romeo 33 1,4IE
Result: Would you buy again? Probably not

‹

›